What Is EBITDA? Definition, Formula, and Why It’s Used in Valuation

Stacks of coins increasing in height next to a small sign labeled EBITDA

Every deal memo, credit agreement, and M&A model has one metric in common: EBITDA. Analysts use it to price acquisitions, set debt covenants, and benchmark performance across entire industries. 

The EV/EBITDA multiple is the most widely used valuation ratio in comparable company analysis, with sector averages ranging from roughly 7x in traditional industries to over 28x in software. Yet many people who use the term daily cannot explain why depreciation gets added back, or when the metric quietly misleads.

We will now explain what EBITDA is, how to calculate it two ways, how it flows into valuation, and where it breaks down.

What Exactly Is EBITDA?

EBITDA stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization.

It measures a company’s operating profitability before the impact of financing decisions, tax environments, and non-cash accounting charges. The goal is comparability. Two companies in the same industry may carry very different debt loads, operate in different tax jurisdictions, or have made different accounting choices around asset depreciation. EBITDA strips those differences out, leaving a cleaner view of core operating performance.

It is a non-GAAP (and non-IFRS) metric. Companies calculate and disclose it voluntarily, which matters when you get to the limitations section below.

Chalkboard showing the acronym EBITDA and its full meaning written out
EBITDA is commonly used by investors to compare profitability between companies by removing the effects of financing and accounting decisions; Source: shutterstock.com

The Formula: Two Approaches

It can be calculated starting from two different points on the income statement. Both arrive at the same result.

ApproachFormula
Top-down (from EBIT)EBITDA = EBIT + Depreciation + Amortization
Bottom-up (from Net Income)EBITDA = Net Income + Interest + Taxes + Depreciation + Amortization

When to use which: The top-down approach is faster when EBIT is readily available on the income statement. The bottom-up approach is standard when building a financial model from scratch, since it starts from net income and adds back each excluded item individually. Depreciation and amortization figures should ideally be sourced from the cash flow statement or supporting disclosures to ensure accuracy.

Worked Example

Diagram showing a funnel from EBITDA to EBIT to EBT and finally net income
Each step from EBITDA to net income accounts for additional costs, giving a more complete picture of a company’s financial performance; Source: shutterstock.com

Consider a fictional company, Nordhaven Industrial, with the following annual financials:

Line ItemAmount
Revenue$50,000,000
Net Income$4,200,000
Interest Expense$800,000
Tax Expense$1,400,000
Depreciation & Amortization$2,600,000
EBITDA$9,000,000

Using the bottom-up formula: $4,200,000 + $800,000 + $1,400,000 + $2,600,000 = $9,000,000

Using the top-down formula: EBIT = Net Income + Interest + Taxes = $6,400,000. Then add Depreciation to EBIT $6,400,000 + $2,600,000 = $9,000,000

Same result, different starting point.

How It Is Used in Valuation

Beyond being a profitability metric, EBITDA serves as the denominator in the most widely used valuation multiple in practice: EV/EBITDA.

The EV/EBITDA Multiple

Puzzle pieces with dollar symbols being assembled, with one red piece standing out
The EV to EBITDA multiple is commonly used to compare company valuations by relating enterprise value to operating earnings; Source: shutterstock.com

Enterprise Value (EV) represents the total value of a business, typically calculated as market capitalisation/Equity Value plus net debt (and, where relevant, minority interest and preferred equity). Dividing EV by EBITDA tells you how many times EBITDA an acquirer is paying for the business.

EV/EBITDA = Enterprise Value / EBITDA

It is capital structure-neutral, which makes it far more useful for cross-company comparisons than the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. EV/EBITDA is the go-to metric in comparable company analysis (comps), leveraged buyout (LBO) models, and M&A due diligence.

Benchmark ranges to know:

ContextTypical EV/EBITDA Range
Private companies4x – 7x
Public companies (broad market)8x – 14x
Technology / software15x – 30x+
Capital-intensive industrials5x – 9x
[/su_table]

These are directional benchmarks, not rules. Always compare within the same industry and time period.

LTM vs. NTM EBITDA

Illustration of people around a funnel showing EBITDA, EBIT, and EBT leading to money
Investors often compare LTM and NTM EBITDA to understand past performance and estimate future growth potential; Source: shutterstock.com

One distinction that rarely appears in basic EBITDA guides is which EBITDA analysts actually use in valuation.

  • LTM EBITDA (Last Twelve Months): Based on the most recent four quarters of actual results. Used when historical performance is the most reliable data available, such as in credit analysis or private company transactions.
  • NTM EBITDA (Next Twelve Months): A forward-looking estimate built from analyst projections or management guidance. Used in public equity valuation and strategic M&A, where buyers are pricing future performance, not past results.

Using the wrong time period in a comparable company analysis produces misleading multiples. If your comps use NTM and your target company uses LTM, the comparison is not valid.

Credit Analysis

A sack labeled EBITDA sitting on a surface with coins scattered around it
Lenders often use EBITDA to assess a company’s ability to repay debt by focusing on core operating earnings; Source: shutterstock.com

Lenders frequently use EBITDA as the denominator in leverage ratios, the most common being Total Debt / EBITDA. In many cases, ratios around 3x–4x may be consistent with investment-grade profiles, depending on the sector, stability of cash flows, and lender criteria.

Covenant thresholds are often set relative to EBITDA, which is why the metric appears directly in loan agreements and bond indentures.

Margin

EBITDA margin expresses EBITDA as a percentage of revenue.

EBITDA Margin = EBITDA / Revenue

Using the Nordhaven example above: $9,000,000 / $50,000,000 = 18% EBITDA margin

Margins vary significantly by industry. Software businesses can run EBITDA margins above 30%. Grocery retailers may run at 4–6%. Comparing margins only makes sense within the same sector.

Where EBITDA Misleads: The Limitations

Clipboard with a note listing the components of EBITDA alongside colorful paper clips
While useful, EBITDA can be misleading because it ignores costs like capital expenditures and debt, which still impact a company’s financial health; Source: shutterstock.com

This is useful precisely because it simplifies. That simplification also makes it easy to abuse. Here is where analysts should apply extra scrutiny:

  • Capital-intensive industries. In manufacturing, mining, oil and gas, or infrastructure, depreciation is not an accounting abstraction. It represents real wear on assets that must eventually be replaced.Even when depreciation is added back, it does not necessarily reflect the actual capital expenditure required to maintain the asset base. In many industries, maintenance capex can exceed accounting depreciation, further widening the gap between EBITDA and true cash generation. Warren Buffett made this point bluntly: “Trumpeting EBITDA is a particularly pernicious practice. Doing so implies that depreciation is not truly an expense. That’s nonsense.” 
  • High working capital businesses. It ignores changes in receivables, inventory, and payables. A business with growing EBITDA but deteriorating working capital may be generating far less actual cash than the headline number suggests.
  • Growth companies with heavy capital expenditure. Sustaining growth requires real cash outflows. It does not reflect capex, so a company investing heavily in its future will show higher EBITDA than its true free cash flow generation warrants.
  • Adjusted EBITDA. Companies are free to add back items beyond D&A: restructuring charges, stock-based compensation, one-time legal costs, and more. There are no accounting standards governing what qualifies. Always read the reconciliation table in any disclosure carefully. The gap between reported EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA is often significant. In practice, ‘Adjusted EBITDA’ is often the primary figure used in transactions. However, adjustments can be aggressive and subjective, particularly in private equity contexts. Analysts should scrutinize each adjustment and distinguish between truly non-recurring items and recurring ‘one-offs’ 

EBITDA vs. EBIT: A Quick Note

EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) is simply EBITDA minus depreciation and amortization. For capital-light businesses, the difference is small. For capital-intensive companies, it is large. Analysts working in sectors like infrastructure, heavy manufacturing, or oil and gas often prefer EBIT because it better reflects the real cost of using physical assets.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does EBITDA tell you?
It provides a proxy for operating performance before financing, taxes, and non-cash charges. It is sometimes used as a rough proxy for operating cash flow, but it does not reflect working capital movements or capital expenditures.
Is a 20% EBITDA good?
Generally, yes. A 20% EBITDA margin is considered healthy across most industries. That said, “good” is always relative to the sector. Software companies often run above 30%, while grocery retailers may sit at 4–6%. Always benchmark against industry peers, not a universal standard.
Is EBITDA the same as gross profit?
No. Gross profit is revenue minus cost of goods sold. EBITDA is calculated further down the income statement, after subtracting operating expenses, and then adding back depreciation and amortization. As a result, EBITDA is typically lower than gross profit.
Is EBITDA a profit or revenue?
Neither, technically. It is a measure of operating earnings. It sits below revenue and below gross profit on the income statement, but above net income. Think of it as a proxy for operating cash flow, not a top-line or bottom-line figure.
Is a 70% gross margin good?
Yes, in most contexts a 70% gross margin is strong. It is typical for software, pharmaceuticals, and certain subscription businesses where the cost of delivering a product is low. For manufacturing, retail, or food businesses, a 70% gross margin would be exceptional. Context and industry benchmarks matter.
Is a business worth 3 times profit?
It can be, particularly for small private businesses valued on a simple earnings multiple. However, 3x profit (net income) is on the lower end of the range. Most valuation work uses EBITDA multiples rather than net profit, and those multiples typically range from 4x to 8x for private businesses depending on size, sector, and growth profile. A 3x multiple may reflect high risk, low growth, or a distressed situation.
Is 20% margin the same as 25% markup?
Yes. A 25% markup on cost produces a 20% profit margin on the selling price. If something costs $100 and you mark it up 25%, you sell it for $125. Your profit is $25, which is 20% of the $125 selling price. Margin and markup measure the same profit in dollars but from different bases: margin uses the selling price, markup uses the cost.

Conclusion

This is a powerful tool for comparing operating performance across companies with different capital structures, tax environments, and accounting policies. In valuation, EV/EBITDA is the standard comparable company metric. Knowing whether you are working with LTM or NTM EBITDA, and why it matters, separates analysts who use the metric correctly from those who do not.

Understanding the formula is the first step. Knowing when EBITDA is an appropriate proxy and when it materially distorts economic reality is what differentiates strong analysts.

Want to go deeper? At Financial Modelling University, our courses cover EBITDA in the full context of financial modelling, including how to build LBO models, run comparable company analysis, and stress-test valuation assumptions the way practitioners do. Explore the courses here.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Print

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *